Fulqrum Publishing Home   |   Register   |   Today Posts   |   Members   |   UserCP   |   Calendar   |   Search   |   FAQ

Go Back   Official Fulqrum Publishing forum > Fulqrum Publishing > IL-2 Sturmovik: Cliffs of Dover > Technical threads > Performance threads

Performance threads All discussions about CoD performnce

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-19-2011, 03:24 PM
III/JG53_Don III/JG53_Don is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 219
Default CloD and overclocking

I was wondering if CloD actually benefits from extense overclocking of allready decent CPU, like the famous 2500/2600k, since I am struggling if I should wait for the Ivy Bridge in March/April or better give the Sandy Bridge a shot.

What I heard is that the game uses barely 60% of the first and 15-20% of the other 3 cores, so my conclusion would be that overclocking wouldn't do the game any performance profits in this present build?! Having this in mind, these CPU and its overclocking possibilities should do the job perfectly for this game and its future enhancements (dynamic weather, damage model for trees etc). without a need to upgrade for the next 2-3 years in terms of a new CPU.
Just an assumption by myself.
Would be nice to hear some enlightments on this topic from an owner of these (or equivalent) CPUS
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-19-2011, 03:29 PM
CWMV's Avatar
CWMV CWMV is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 758
Default

I run my 2600k at 4.4ghz. It's really an amazing difference. Totally worth it.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by banned View Post
Just fix the friggin thing you boof heads. It's getting boring now. Only 11 people on the whole thing. Yawn.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-20-2011, 01:51 AM
Igo kyu's Avatar
Igo kyu Igo kyu is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 703
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by III/JG53_Don View Post
I was wondering if CloD actually benefits from extense overclocking of allready decent CPU, like the famous 2500/2600k, since I am struggling if I should wait for the Ivy Bridge in March/April or better give the Sandy Bridge a shot.

What I heard is that the game uses barely 60% of the first and 15-20% of the other 3 cores, so my conclusion would be that overclocking wouldn't do the game any performance profits in this present build?! Having this in mind, these CPU and its overclocking possibilities should do the job perfectly for this game and its future enhancements (dynamic weather, damage model for trees etc). without a need to upgrade for the next 2-3 years in terms of a new CPU.
Just an assumption by myself.
Would be nice to hear some enlightments on this topic from an owner of these (or equivalent) CPUS
I think the issue you are talking about may be that the 2600k does hyperthreading (the 2500k doesn't), which means that half of the cores are virtual, and running in shared time on the real cores, which means that Windows Task Manager, which thinks that the hyperthreaded cores are really capable of the full speed of the real cores, will only show the cores at 50% utilisation when the cores are actually fully utilised.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-20-2011, 09:27 AM
Qpassa's Avatar
Qpassa Qpassa is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Valladolid-Spain-EU
Posts: 700
Default

I have my 920 at 3.8 Ghz
__________________
Expecting:
Call of Duty

Youtube Profile: http://www.youtube.com/user/E69Qpassa
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-20-2011, 03:52 PM
III/JG53_Don III/JG53_Don is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 219
Default

Taking this into consideration it seems to be more like a problem of the ineffective utilisation of multi cores..... so the game benefits mainly from the oc of the first core and minor from the other 3 i guess.

further enhancements of the multi core utilisation would equilize the benfits of overclocking i suppose... as soon as dynamic weather and maybe AI are transfered to the other cores.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-22-2011, 04:05 AM
AKA_Tenn AKA_Tenn is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 213
Default

i think how this game works is more like... it uses 1 core as the main one, and offloads smaller tasks to the other cores, that way if you only have a two cores, it can offload multiple tasks to the second core without bogging it down... games are still not truly multi-threaded yet

Last edited by AKA_Tenn; 11-22-2011 at 04:09 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-23-2011, 02:58 AM
l3uLLDoZeR l3uLLDoZeR is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 113
Default

To answer your question, YES overclocking your cpu makes a huge difference in this game. I don't think the number of cores matters as much as speed, so overclocking is the way to go.

I had an e8400 overclocked to 3.6ghz and it ran the game pretty well.
Now I have a i2500K @ 4.5 ghz ....so 2 extra cores and a higher overclock. I gained about 15fps and got to turn a few setting from medium to high, but nothing drastic.

Whatever cpu you have it's worth overclocking as long as you have good cooling in your case and for the cpu. Don't crank anything with a stock cooler!
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-25-2011, 02:02 PM
ATAG_Septic ATAG_Septic is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 160
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Qpassa View Post
I have my 920 at 3.8 Ghz
I run my 930 at 4.2 stable and cool, water-cooled. I might not be quite so adventurous with different motherboard etc.

Thanks very much for sharing your results Cheesehawk, I've often wondered whether it's a benefit to Clod but don't have the patience to do scientific tests (I always seem to end up changing more than one setting between tests!)

Last edited by ATAG_Septic; 11-25-2011 at 02:09 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 11-27-2011, 01:29 PM
III/JG53_Don III/JG53_Don is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 219
Default

Are some technical details of the new Ivy Bridges allready known? Like how many cores and with which initial ghz they run? Any Price speculations?
I just found very general informations about it, but nothing more...
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 11-24-2011, 06:56 AM
335th_GRAthos 335th_GRAthos is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,240
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by cheesehawk View Post
Building a new rig over the last two weeks, these were my experiences.

......................................

New:
i7 920
6Gb DDR3
GTX 560ti w/2Gb

CPU@stock 2.6
same textures as above
FPS: 25-60 (Vsync'd) ave:36
.................................................

.................................................
CPU @ 4.2Ghz
increased Buildings to high, Land shading to high, forests to High
FPS 35-60 Ave:44-46
Cheesehawk, how did you go from 3.1 to 4.2GHz?
I have mine overclocked from 2.9 to 3.6GHz but any higher seemed too complicated (i7-940 with DFI LANPARTY UTX58 T3eH8 and Corsair DDR3-1600 probably my 1600MHz, 8-8-8-24, 1.65V is too slow....)

~S~
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:31 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 2007 Fulqrum Publishing. All rights reserved.