[Vilk]

I wonder from what you deduce I was comparing attack and defense but that wasn't the point. The point was to compare Leadership and Attack.

Anyway you just confirm what I was saying, that an attack point doesn't worth 3.3% damages but less because of the case of Defense > Attack. That's exactly what I was trying to explain.

That put in question quite a lot the reasoning arguing that until level 14 Leadership doesn't worth much to be choose. Not too mention some other points linked to a bigger stack like some special unit skills linked to stack size and not at all to damages.

I don't want say that some variation like not pick much Leadership during first levels isn't a good option but it's not clear at all that it's the best and the single best.

EDIT: And about attack vs defense that wasn't my point, but about it, yes it's obvious it's symmetrical from a math point of view as it's just a difference between the two. But people argue that attack is still better because with good tactics your attack is more important, you take care to attack first and even if enemy stack counter attack it is already reduced, you even take care to attack more than you get attacked.