Quote:
Originally Posted by JG26_EZ
I'm not looking for discussion with you IceFire, sorry but I just wanted a simple answer from someone on the team.
Yes.. Sorry for not being more detailed earlier.. but it's just that it's so obvious how "bionic" the AI are now, that I didn't think I needed to go into detail. I quite simply asked "the team" if they plan on adjusting the behaviour of the AI in the next patch.
I expected one of two kinds of answers (from someone that actually knows).
"No, we're happy with the behaviour of the AI".
-or-
"Yes, we're still looking into making the AI behave better".
If it's the first answer, then I'll start to elaborate and maybe moan a little. If it's the second answer, I'll patiently wait for the next patch.
|
Why not mail them directly then? It's a public forum... thus discussions can and do happen.
If you're willing to entertain at least one more opinion.. the "Yes, we're still looking into making the AI behave better" is far and away the likely answer. I'm a third party contributor to TD... and I know from experience that they are always looking for help, for comments, and for feedback. But I stress that "obvious" problems are not obvious to all and it's far better to document exactly what the issue is in explicit detail.
That way... things get done and we all benefit.