View Single Post
  #5  
Old 11-18-2013, 07:18 PM
He111's Avatar
He111 He111 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Newcastle, NSW, Australia
Posts: 707
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MB_Avro_UK View Post
This is what I had in mind:

(Quote from Wiki. I've also read similar reports elsewhere).

Initially, Luftwaffe fighters suffered losses when "bouncing" flights of Defiants from the rear, apparently mistaking them for Hurricanes.[12] The German pilots were unaware of the Defiant's rear-firing armament and encountered concentrated defensive fire.

With a change in Luftwaffe tactics, opposing fighters were able to outmanoeuvre the Defiant and attack it from below or dead ahead, where the turret offered no defence. Defiant losses quickly mounted, particularly among the gunners, who were often unable to leave stricken aircraft. The additional weight of the turret and the second crewman plus the aerodynamic drag gave the Defiant a lower performance than conventional single-seat fighter aircraft.[13]


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boulton_Paul_Defiant


Best Regards,
MB_Avro

That's why FS AI should have a WEAK-POINTs grid for each plane. In your example, a new defiant weak points would be - Unknown, to german fighters until they learn the secrect (downed Defiant in enemy territory) then the weak points would be - 6 Low, head on.

H
__________________
.
========================================
.
.....--oOo-- --oOo-- HE-111 --oOo-- --oOo--.....
.
========================================
-oOo- Intel i7-2600K (non-clocked) -oOo- GA-P67A
-oOo- DF 85 full tower -oOo- 1000W corsair
-oOo- 8 GB 1600Hz -oOo- 2 x GTX 580 1.5M (295.73)
-oOo- 240 SSD -oOo- W7 64bit
-oOo- PB2700 LED 2560 x 1440 6ms 60Hz -oOo-
========================================
Reply With Quote