View Single Post
  #68  
Old 08-02-2013, 07:42 PM
horseback horseback is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: San Diego, California
Posts: 190
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by pandacat View Post
I know P-47s were used for AG attacks. As a matter of fact, p47s were used in AG operations more frequently than P51s. What I am arguing is how come they never picked p47 for Korea if p47 is better than p51?
While P-47s were generally considered much better suited to ground attack than the Mustang, there weren't any in Japan when the festivities in Korea began, and the limited number of reasonably well-maintained Jugs were located in the US and Europe (where, if Stalin had decided to strike while the British and Americans were distracted by Korea) they would be desperately needed. Additionally, the Jug needed more maintenance time per flight hour and consumed a great deal more aviation grade fuel (yeah, we had plenty back then, but most of it had to be shipped from US West Coast refineries and that still cost a lot of money, and meant that some other needed items would have had to wait for shipping space).

In any case, the USAF was making a wholesale transition to jets; the Mustang was supposed to be replaced by F-80s and F-84s 'in two weeks, be sure' throughout the Korean conflict.

cheers

horseback
Reply With Quote