Quote:
Originally Posted by Treetop64
No different than it was in real life. Read any reliable source and you'll learn that it was just as unpopular then as you're finding out now, for virtually the same reasons you're expressing.
|
+1...
hs-129 was not really bad plane, in total, but, Lagarto, what you write is very similar to what i read about hs-129 in different sources...
and on russian, from authors of books and articles about il-2, have several good articles with name
"Planes of the battlefield, the Eastern front (1941-45.)" ie, about soviet and german attack planes like il-2, 87, fw 190 and hs-129...
in particular, authors criticized all sides and about germany one of main findings - it's resistance of german armor and bulletproof glass which compared with soviet analogues were less resistant...
for example, in tests 6 mm of german armor it's approximately 3.4 mm of soviet AB-1 (type of armor, which was used for il-2), 75 mm of german bulletproof glass with better, than soviet glass, visibility it's approximately 54 mm of soviet K-4, etc...
interesting, how it's confirmed/veracity in german sources etc? because it's important too, if we talk about armored "nose" of fw 190, i think...
well, anyway, apparently it's one of reasons why hs-129 was not really mass attack plane...
and
here "hs-129 in NII VVS KA" with interesting details (on russian, but in end have summary of findings)...