Thread: Was Oleg Maddox too far ahead of his time?
View Single Post
  #6  
Old 12-14-2012, 11:47 AM
6S.Manu 6S.Manu is offline
Approved Member
  
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Venice - Italy
Posts: 585
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by ElAurens View Post
The RoF enigine is an older development and has severe limitations.

I hope I am wrong, but I don't think I am.
You're not wrong, imo.

As I said in the past, I really don't like WW1 planes but I've bought many ROF plane packages: I hope others will do the same with BOS even if the engine is outdated. In that way we can support 777 to develop contents (planes and theatres) and above all a new generation of their engine.

The only thing I ask to 777 is to be honest with the customer: they already wrote about their clear objectives on the first "developer diary"... it's enough for me.
__________________

A whole generation of pilots learned to treasure the Spitfire for its delightful response to aerobatic manoeuvres and its handiness as a dogfighter. Iit is odd that they had continued to esteem these qualities over those of other fighters in spite of the fact that they were of only secondary importance tactically.Thus it is doubly ironic that the Spitfire’s reputation would habitually be established by reference to archaic, non-tactical criteria.
Reply With Quote