View Single Post
  #210  
Old 12-11-2012, 01:39 PM
ACE-OF-ACES's Avatar
ACE-OF-ACES ACE-OF-ACES is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: NM
Posts: 2,248
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Crumpp View Post
LOL

Leave it to Crumpp to cut-n-paste quotes from a website with the title 109 myths as PROOF that uneven slat activation could NOT cause spins.. Yup no chance of bias at that website! NOT! One glance at that site and anyone can see that site goes way out of it's way to interpret what was said about uneven slat activation in the best possible light for the 109

With that said, instead of 'words' from a biased Internet website, how about 'words' from actual Bf109 pilots in a book by David Isby called The Decisive Duel: Spitfire vs 109? Will this meet your standards of proof robtek?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Oberleutnant Erwin Leykauf
Less experienced pilots could put a Bf 109 into a stall and spin when the slats deployed on one wing and not the other in a tight turn. When slats deployed unevenly in tight turns, they would disrupt the airflow, causing the ailerons to ‘snatch’ enough to shake a Bf 109, spoiling the pilot’s aim
Now it is decision time.. As in who are you going to belive?

1) A biased website quote posted by Crumpp.
2) A quote of an actual WWII Bf109 pilot.

The choice is clear, but I am sure that some folks like Crumpp, Tomcat, and robtek will find creative ways to disregard what this actual WWII Bf109 pilot had to say about the slats causing spins..
__________________
Theres a reason for instrumenting a plane for test..
That being a pilots's 'perception' of what is going on can be very different from what is 'actually' going on.