Quote:
|
Sorry Josf, I ment perfect for me - in my opinion of a frequent 109 pilot. I hope it makes sense now.
|
Anyone,
I do not know why the attitude expressed above is chosen or perhaps it is just a reaction to what I wrote.
Opinions are one thing, facts are another thing, and when opinions support the facts, then that is what can happen too.
If someone says plane A is perfect for Energy Fighting, then that is an opinion.
What, someone else may ask, measures this condition of perfection, since someone may be curious to know what is being used to form that opinion.
Why the answer isn't the answer requested is entirely up to the person with the opinion.
Quote:
|
I hope it makes sense now.
|
What is meant by the words " the 109 is perfect energy fighter "?
I hope that the question makes sense now.
Quote:
|
You go ahead and measure it for us
|
Why does my writing inspire someone to give me permission to do something I already do, as if I need someone's permission?
Quote:
|
after all you were banned from the forums only
|
If that is factual then I'd like to know as much, as far as I know I was not banned from this forum. Can I take your word on that fact?
"not from playing the game and flying say on ATAG"
I was on last night with 2 in our squad. Why do you assume so much, and why do you feel that your interest in my activities are worthy of mention on this topic?
Why is the topic turning into my personal life, according to you?
"I am looking forward for any facts you provide."
Which facts?
1.
As far as I know I was not banned on this forum.
2.
I fly the ATAG server regularly with other members of the squad I joined.
3.
My question to you had to do with how "the 109 is perfect energy fighter" and you responded by ignoring the question, and then turning the "discussion" into my personal activities.
4.
You are giving me permission to do things that I do not need your permission to do, nor do I want your permission.
Those facts?
How about a measure for unloaded (dive) acceleration between a Spitfire and a 109 in the game?
If there is no significant difference then the Spitfire is as perfect an energy fighter as is the 109 and the same cannot be said for angles fighting since the Spitfire is significantly better at angles fighting, more along the lines of "perfect" since the 109 is more along the lines of "imperfect" in relative sustained turn performance in level flight.
How about a measure of corner velocity compared between the Spitfire and 109?
How about an actual answer to the actual question asked instead of diversion from the question asked, and diversion onto me personally?
How about that fact?
How is that perfection measured exactly?
That was the topic question asked after the following subjective opinion was made:
Quote:
|
the 109 is perfect energy fighter
|
If people buying the game are finding the game being constantly adjusted to suit the wishes of a select few forum members, as documented on this forum, and they are then asking questions concerning the legitimacy of those viewpoints, as is documented on this forum, then it is my opinion that those people deserve an accurate answer, and they do not deserve to have their persons attacked in this manner.
How about that fact?