Quote:
Originally Posted by K_Freddie
Yeah, and those reports are not relevant to the envelope Gaston is talking about.. You really showed us haven't you !! 
A matter of fact that none of you have come up with a decent counter argument, or proof therof, beyond reasonable doubt that Gaston is talking tripe.
You all revert back to aerodynamic formulae and charts, most of which are from pilots that you wish to discredit, so where does that leave your argument.
While aerodynamics does play a significant role, most of you are not willing to remotely admit that there might be a problem with the data, in the area that is in discussion.
If I were a test pilot, I'll be crying with laughter. |
Interestingly I have not gone back to aerodynamic formula or charts.
All I have done is go back to what Gaston has put forward as his evidence and offerred to debate his theory using the data that he claims supports his theory.
It is notable that he has not taken up that challange. The question I put to you is why hasn't he taken up the offer which is more than fair.
Just to remind you. He has said that 95% of all combats involve sustained turn and that the combat reports support this statement.
My challange is that
he picks any combat report, from
any of the lists of combat reports and we will analyse the ten either side of the report
that he has chosen and see the percentage.
Why do you think he hasn't taken up that offer. Or indeed can you see what is wrong with that offer
I await your observation with interest