Quote:
Originally Posted by studiox19
Hi Potz,
Yeah, i gave it a 10 - more of a 91 out of 100 though - so maybe a 9. i just think that if the game was released as it is now, after all the patches, i think we would all be pretty impressed. Admittedly, getting to here has been a rough ride and, in it's initial state, i would have given it 5/10. I think average pro reviews would now give it 85 - 95 out of 100 easily.
But hey, that's just my opinion . . . . . .
I'd like to hear from those who have now given it a 1 or 2 as well . . . . . .
|
first thanks for answer my question
I gave 6 out 10 cause, the lack of features, now we only have one game mode, online multiplayer dogfights, and the most good thing about 1946 was left it out and is Coop mode, also we have no dynamic campaign those rest so much point regarding game modes
Also what the devs advertised before release was not acomplished in many ways
the lack of AA rest a lot of points too.
I can keep going on and on but most of the flaws where already covered in this forums
and most important is the stop in supporting the tittle from devs
the first pro review gave the game just a 4.5 really bad for the reputation of the company, and after a year in my opinion just rise 1.5 points from that initial release.
Potz