View Single Post
  #39  
Old 10-22-2012, 04:58 AM
He111's Avatar
He111 He111 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Newcastle, NSW, Australia
Posts: 707
Default

If a user was willing to buy the same modelling tool 1c deveoplers use, to change the Blenheim for example, to add a 4 x 303 mg pod under the aircraft and create a fighter, which he gives to the community to use , and it passes 1C standards, how does this divide the community ? yes, it's 1Cs software, they will need to put their final stamp on any user mods / changes.

If CLOD was a great seller and 1C had a huge team developing CLOD / BOM then we wouldn't need user/developers .. but unfortunately that's not the case. 1c has stated that they have washed their hands of future CLOD development, which some users think is a little hastie ... so why not allow users to add content .. for a fee (maybe?) .. or 1C hires extra developers for user-paid additions (although that could be too expensive)

I would like to see, and willing to pay for/work on, the following;

(1) Blenheim Fighter - start with something easy.
(2) Blenheim short-nose fighter - changed cockpit
(3) flyable defiant - new cockpit and gunner
(4) flyable Wellington - new cockpit, nav, radio, gunners
(5) flyable Beaufighter - new cockpit, nav

BTW, i'm not a skilled programmer, I know 'C' etc but that was along time ago. We users would need some skilled help ..


.
__________________
.
========================================
.
.....--oOo-- --oOo-- HE-111 --oOo-- --oOo--.....
.
========================================
-oOo- Intel i7-2600K (non-clocked) -oOo- GA-P67A
-oOo- DF 85 full tower -oOo- 1000W corsair
-oOo- 8 GB 1600Hz -oOo- 2 x GTX 580 1.5M (295.73)
-oOo- 240 SSD -oOo- W7 64bit
-oOo- PB2700 LED 2560 x 1440 6ms 60Hz -oOo-
========================================

Last edited by He111; 10-22-2012 at 05:02 AM.
Reply With Quote