Quote:
Originally Posted by MadTommy
Incorrect.. Release Candidate.. is just that a candidate. Not a release version.
The patch released was released under the title " Friday, September 28 - Patch Release Candidate and Su-26!".
You are just making an assumption to suit your own ends.
Why you feel the need to defend the presence of glaring bugs is not easy to understand. Let the bug be reported and move on.
If you understood software development you would know that development starts, then an alpha build is generated, this progresses to a beta build. In both these stages the developers know bugs will exist. But to a lesser extend in beta than alpha. Then when the developer hopes has has solved all the bugs a RC is released to receive feedback and to catch any bugs that remain. The bugs in a RC are normally hard to find and only located when the software is put out to a very number of users.
I'm sorry but not being able to start a plane in a plane simulator is NOT an bug that should be in a RC or even a beta patch. That is something that should not make it out of alpha stage.
|
I could care less what they call it, the point is its "STILL A BETA" that "required further testing" If they were confident there were no bugs they would have sent it directly to Steam. Now they will gauge their testing and ours, fix what can be fixed, and depending on the amount of code changes, either send out another test RC beta, or send it directly to Steam.