Quote:
Originally Posted by Kurfürst
Wrong on all accounts.
|
These are just facts.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kurfürst
And with the specs laid down within being guaranteed within +/- 5% by the manufacturer of the product.
|
Manufacturer's quaranteed performance is not a test data and not relevent.
You were asked real test data for 500kmh and none has been posted.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kurfürst
Really. And what power, what supercharger settings, what airframe conditions?
|
Not specified but these are real tests of the real series planes.
Still, these match well with 109F speed 495kmh for 1.3ata, 500 kmh for 109E at same power or at 1.35ata is unlogical.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kurfürst
Speculation.
|
Yes in small degree, but much less speculation than assume series engine like you do.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kurfürst
Look at the source files - or the fact that we a 5-min boost pressure of 1.35 ata...
|
Hm... in game test data is showing 475kmh which is actually slightly faster than swiss tests but acceptable.
Good work 1C, you are able to see behind speculations.
Edit: The point is that if you put doubt on various data on Spitfire at +12lbs, as you did, you should be just as critical in the case of the 109 data. Otherwise a reader gets impression of double standards.
No anykind of polemics, sarcasm, arrogance nor all those little annoyances intended. Leaving this discussion for next 5 days.