[QUOTE=MiG-3U;463981]Please post.
Here.
Flight test.
Guranteed specs.
I would like to see similiar detailed specs for the Spitfire. At +12 lbs boost. Calibration curves, engine bench test, detailed description of airframe conditions and temperature conditions.
None such exists...
Quote:
|
V15 chart on your site shows clearly two speed supercharger
|
Nope.
Quote:
|
and text sites höhen and bodenlader,
|
Yes. And?
Quote:
|
power value in the calculation is 1018ps vs 990ps for Db601A.
|
And have the DB 601Aa (not the DB 601A) in the sim, which had 1045 PS (1175 PS WEP) anyway. So the tested example had to reached 498 kph at 1018 PS. We have an 1045 PS variant. Are you saying that it should be even faster..?
Now, care to tell me, that regardless of the supercharger design, that what is wrong with the test, since the plane has about the same power our plane in the sim has.
Nope.
I also have similiar curves for G-14, G-6, G-1 etc. on my site. It only shows that the DB 60x supercharger could be run at will at fixed speeds as well. It's no witchcraft, all that is needed to override the barometric control of the hydraulic coupling. Which they did often during these tests, see some of the G-6 and G-14 tests:
http://kurfurst.org/Performance_test...44_trials.html
Besides the actual supercharger operation is completely irrelevant. We KNOW for a fact that the plane had 951 PS in high speed flight (about 50-60 PS down on power) and reached 493 kph with it (which they calculated to be good for 498 kph at the nominal rating of 996 PS). Any other 109 in similar configuration with the same power should reach the same of course.