View Single Post
  #24  
Old 09-11-2012, 05:05 PM
winny winny is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Manchester UK
Posts: 1,508
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by raaaid View Post
well if you consider science(modern church) definition a perpetuum mobile is that one that violates the 2nd principle of thermodinamics, as you point it creates energy

im more simple as having studied latin perpetuum mobile means it moves till it dies

just as the drinking bird the only KNOWN thermodinamic engine tha NEEDS NO FUEL

you can make a mercury barometer scaled 10000000000000 times in thickness and would work just as its model

then why not a dinking bird to produce energy?

well the petrochemicals dont want it so they brainwashed people into thinking if its not done its because its no no good, of course not good for them

the amount of energy you can get from this is unlimited just make it thicker, and oh boy did i study thermodinamics and physics

edit:

and thinking way out of the box:

dont you think that ufo in that giant dippy birds video i posted 1st confirms its hot stuff?
Forget latin. Your post was in English... Sort of. The recognised definition of perpetual motion is that it will continue forever until somebody or something stops it. By your definition a fruit fly that lives for one day is perpetual... Ridiculous.


Depends on what your definition of fuel is. Dippy birds work because of the chemical contained in the 'abdomen' of the bird. To make giant dippy birds would be financially un-workable. You'd need to produce vast quantities of the chemical, causing environmental issues and incurring large costs. The bigger the bird the longer it would take to 'drink'.

Holding the dippy bird up as some sort of example of a perpetual motion engine is just wrong. It isn't. It isn't as efficient as a solar panel, would cost more to make and the price per kilowatt would be astronomical.

Seriously raaid, as a method of energy production it's a non starter. Dippy birds have been around since the 1940's. If there was anything in it as an energy source somebody (probably the guy who owns the patent) would have done it..

Next....
Reply With Quote