Quote:
Originally Posted by 5./JG27.Farber
Took you long enough...
|
True.. dang real world keeps getting in the way of me doing more virtual world stuff!
Quote:
Originally Posted by 5./JG27.Farber
Some of its not there
|
Well.. do tell!
In that one reason to post the current status is to get feedback as to what people would like to see.. So with that said, what is 'missing' as far as your concerned? In that it might be a simple mater to add it.
Quote:
Originally Posted by 5./JG27.Farber
but alls forgiven if its accurate and comprehensive... Time will tell...
|
Which is another reason for posting the current status.. To see if anyone can find any errors that need fixing (improve accuracy) and to see if anyone can find anything that falls short of being a complete test (improve comprehensiveness).. So please, can you provide some details of the criteria that you would be using to base your claims of accuracy and comprehensiveness on.. So I can improve both if necessary.
Quote:
Originally Posted by 5./JG27.Farber
Good luck! Your audience is a pack of wolves!  |
True..
But this is not my first FM validation rodeo!
As already noted, I don't claim to be any historic plane version expert..
Even though I know more than most of the self proclaimed experts!
But I digress..
My goal is to provide the 'tools' for anyone to preform and/or inspect the virtual pilots test methods and results and how they compare to the real world results.
A sort of standard in testing if you will..
Ill leave the arguing as to how high is high or how blue is blue or how real the real world data is to the so called experts!