Quote:
Originally Posted by Crumpp
It is very simple NzTyphoon.
Post the standards developed by the ARC.
Thanks!!
|
Having wasted hours trying to get Crumpp to provide some documentary evidence to prove his cock-eyed theories on 100 octane I am not interested in complying with these demands.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Crumpp
Quote:
|
"The Development of Airplane Stability and Control Technology" has done no research into British aeronautical development after 1913.
|
Wow,
Let's not be obtuse. I never said there was no research in stability and control.
I said they stagnated into an attitude that flying qualities was an academic exercise and that the pilot's opinion was what was practical.
Big difference from what you are claiming. |
Let me complete that for Crumpp:
Quote:
|
"The Development of Airplane Stability and Control Technology" has done no research into British aeronautical development after 1913 and, as such, it has nothing whatsoever to do with the Spitfire's longitudinal stability
|
The only one being obtuse is Crumpp, who tried to use an irrelevant paper to bolster his "case". Anyway I'm done wasting time on Crumpp flogging his dead horse and pointless bug tracker - he can waste as much time as he likes here.