View Single Post
  #670  
Old 08-02-2012, 04:03 PM
Glider Glider is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 441
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 6S.Manu View Post
Warning on pilot's notes are not a fabrication.

According the numbers posted by Glider (even if they're from an limited investigation on only 121 accidents... a small sample of course) the 38% of those planes were lost for a overstressed airframe issue.
It is not a limited investigation on only 121 accidents... a small sample of course
Please read the posting again. These were all the accidents from the beginning of 1941 until the end of the war.

There were 121 Spitfire crash investigations between 1941 and May 1945 involving serious structural failure:
22 aileron instability #
46 pilot overstressed airframe
20 pilot error in cloud
13 misuse of oxygen system- pilot error #
3 pilot blacked out #
17 engine failure/fire #

Those marked # cannot be blamed on the airframe
Which leaves 66 where the airframe was a factor out of 23,000+ built during the war and millions of flights
Of those 66 a number would have been when the aircraft were in training units number unknown. I am confident that you would be hard pushed to find a lower accident rate of any front line fighter of any Air Force

The number of 121 matches the losses in Morgan and Shacklady recognised book on the subject so we have two different sources. Also note that the author worked in the accident branch which is independent form the RAF

If you wish to state that I have incorrect figures you had better support that comment.



Quote:

Let's do it in a mature way... in this thread there are to many childish reactions and it's clear that all is created by the same few posters who keep fighting in every WW2 message board of the web.
I certainly agree that it should be a mature debate, with evidence to support any statement. So I await with some interest your explanation of how you determined that this was a small sample.