View Single Post
  #577  
Old 07-27-2012, 09:08 PM
NZtyphoon NZtyphoon is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: NZ
Posts: 543
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Crumpp View Post
No I am not. You don't seem to understand the effect of weight and speed on airframe loads.

I have the entire report and will post it as part of the bugtracker.

Once again, you are going down the rabbit hole.
The only one going down a rabbit hole is Crumpp, who doesn't seem to understand the cause and effect of bad cg loading on a basically sound design and now assumes that the Spitfire V was prone to break up because it had taken on extra weight and could fly faster.

And what report is Crumpp going to post?

Quote:
Originally Posted by IvanK View Post
So then Mr Crumpp exactly what is wrong stability wise with the IL2 CLOD Spitfire MI I or II Ver 1.06.17582+Hot Fix
Second question, how exactly can Crumpp's bugtracker replicate the longitudinal stability characteristics Crumpp thinks the CLOD Spitfire I & II should have, when there is no option for rough air conditions?

Last edited by NZtyphoon; 07-28-2012 at 10:12 AM.