Quote:
Originally Posted by ATAG_Snapper
Ain't that the truth!
The reason I specified IvanK is because I believe his judgement would be respected by both sides. They may not agree with certain aspects, but he certainly represents himself as even-handed and knowledgeable with both LW and RAF aircraft. As it stands now, the devs seem incapable or unwilling to apply hard data into credible Flight Models. Witness the ongoing RAF fighter debacle that has gotten progressively worse with each CoD iteration, per my earlier post. Certainly both LW and RAF aircraft need serious FM overhauls, including fighters of either side that can actually exceed 30,000 feet!
As it stands now, it would appear that the devs cannot deliver aircraft that either side can accept in terms of FM's, unless they enlist and heed someone such as IvanK to put things right.
|
It "could" work this way. Clearly lots of stuff has to be revised. I think one major problem with altitudes, however, is the lack of propper high altitude atmospheric modelling. I remember a post by Luthier stating that this will come with the sequel.
Funny, they will implement it with a low level combat scenario.
That said, imho, everything making airplanes work in the first place should be fixed with priority.
Does not make much sense to have a propper speeding Spitfire when the Bombers can't level bomb due to Lofte issues to begin with. A Me109 with real life climb speed won't be much of an achiecement if the Hurricane can't even get it's engine started.
Too many basics have to be fixed first before going into fine tuning. But that is just my personal stance.