
07-19-2012, 04:39 PM
|
 |
Approved Member
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 1,198
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by taildraggernut
Appart from ACE there, can you quote 'anybody' that said the Spit was not unstable?
|
In fact, yes I can.
Here:
Quote:
Originally Posted by NZtyphoon
Crumpp is putting a worst-case scenario on the "buffeting"
...
in other threads he has gone as far as to claim that early Spitfires were longitudinally unstable and dangerous to fly
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by NZtyphoon
Now, until Crumpp, or anyone else, can prove beyond reasonable doubt that NACA got their cg calculations right there is a question mark over the longitudinal stability of this Spitfire VA as tested.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fenrir
The NACA test discovered what they discovered - I can't argue with their findings, FOR ONE PARTICULAR AIRCRAFT. However I cannot agree that these are representative of the breed.
|
--
Foot in mouth, etc.
Now let's stop this silly derailment of this thread and stay on topic
|