Quote:
Originally Posted by Crumpp
Why are you regurgitating the same stuff I just posted. Puzzling...
|
Nothing puzzling there, you just forgot to underline the most relevant part for this thread and I fixed it for you; the bob weigh was added because the CoG had slipped too far aft causing londitudinal instability just like Quill notes.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Crumpp
The fact Supermarine recognized that longitudinal instability and took measures to fix it invalidates any pointy tin foil hat theory the instability did not exist.
|
Yep, when the CoG slips too far back, instability exist in pretty much every airplane, including Spitfire and Mustang. Bob weighs were used in some models of both fighters exactly for the same reason: CoG shift. Both aircraft were also stable when the CoG was forward enough.
Here is again A&AEE on stability of the early mark Spitfire:
http://www.spitfireperformance.com/k9787-fuel.html
Quote:
|
(v) Stability - The aircraft is laterally stable at all speeds except in the immediate vicinity of the stall when it is unstable. The aircraft is directionally stable engine 'OFF' and 'ON' at all speeds, but on the climb this is difficult to assess owing to insufficient rudder bias. Longitudinally, the aircraft is stable with centre of gravity forward, but is unstable with centre of gravity normal and aft with engine 'OFF' and 'ON'.
|
CoG was at 5.8" aft datum line when the airplane was found to be longitudinally stable, that is 2" more forward than Naca tested. Note that Spitfire IX had CoG around 5" aft datum line at service load, no need for bob weigh.