Quote:
Originally Posted by Osprey
Farber, please don't get the wrong idea about what I am saying. I gave a solution...
|
Not really, not like below!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Osprey
-solution and one that is more historically accurate is that you tell each leader that they can have amongst their groups 50% E4s, 10% E3's and remainder E1's (or whatever percentage). They can then sort that out according to how many turn up.
|
I like it. You are asking people to do maths 5 mins before we start and in what way should they round - up or down? In fact I request if you want this system in use you provide a table of %'s for August and July for every number from 1 to 14 for easy refrence.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Osprey
What's the use in posting those percentages if you aren't able to stick with them? All the same I'd like to see the raw numbers, COD is too rubbish to even allow viewing of a second stats page!
|
Above this post^
I did it quick might be off a bit but good enough.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Osprey
Regardless of whether RDF was taken out or not does not matter, the fact that it took a large raid to do it and they were unsuccessful most of the time doesn't mean that sending 3 stuka's to each and being successful is in any way a reflection on history. For instance, Ventnor required the entire group of KG76 and KG26 supported by ZG2, JG52, JG1 (top of my head, prolly got some squadrons wrong), the raid was 100+ just for one site. If you want to do that then fine, perhaps we can just change our tactics to have 1 squadron circling each RDF site (there are only 5) and we'll bag 15 no problem, which is better than what we've managed so far  OK, I'm far more of a cynic than klem, |
Net code, cant have to many bombers or people complain like mission 2. Do you even read everything in this thread?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Osprey
I know it'll rub you up the wrong way and I don't mean to do that...  |
You love it.
