View Single Post
  #26  
Old 06-15-2012, 01:59 PM
6S.Tamat's Avatar
6S.Tamat 6S.Tamat is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 133
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Holtzauge View Post
... If I had to choose between better graphics and better flight models then it would have been the latter no contest. On the other hand from a commercial perspective I guess better graphics wins the day over hard core simmers fancies so I can understand the priorities taken from that perspective.
I agree with the fm choice, but the problem is that u need a better physic management in general and then a good environment management (seeing the contacts, the clouds, tree collision etc etc), then the graphic. About the commercial perspective, seeing the results they had until now i would not guess so much .
About the compressibility, despite the interest of the argument, the list of the important stuff to correct or implement is so long that now it is a "not a problem". to give u an example less used of the wrong simulation of the atmosphere, the "amazing" Cem if you check the engineswith the megnetos, does not change the rpm, and for me this is a bigger feeling killer (an trust killer, as they pushed alot on the new total sim engine management).
__________________

Last edited by 6S.Tamat; 06-15-2012 at 02:02 PM.
Reply With Quote