nope how google ranks webs its a mistery i wathced on tv that traffic influenced a lot
so to my question if force of friction is dependant of surface your answer is yes and no both
tell me how could have einstein accounted for sun atmosphere star light bending being this 15 time bigger than gravitational lensing
you could save words like drug adict damged mind, more stupid than a plant
you know too well thats what a child does when losing an argument
how did eisntein account for atmospheric starlight bending
is howed you one link that explain this wasnt account till the 90s show me one where shows he did account for this eeffect
the balls in your side since every knows he couldnt know what the sun atmosphere was like
edit:
galileo tomamas and culomb and my teacher have a very clear answer for this:
is force of friction(not coeficient of friction) dpendant of surface?
a)yes
b)no
c)yes and no
wrong answer will be 3.333333..... negative points
edit:
outlaw you brough up an interesting point:
i have a damage mind cause i take my ramblings as FACT
wel in this thread i havemention i DIDNT KNOW if relativity was true or not, in fact in the graviational lensing or not happening is the key on causality, although this was brought down imo by INSTANT quantum entanglement
so im QUESTIONING relativity
while you take relativity as FACT
who has the damaged mind then?
me who question and realizes i know nothing for sure
or you who takes OTHERS experiences and stories as FACT