i already answered cause they are cherry picked words
your ignoring the fact that i provided a high level link claiming refraction light bending WASNT TAKEN INOT ACCOUNT till the 90s, what means eisntein didnt acount for what means einstein is a farce as the stablishment truths
culombs or montomon laws im not sure any more what to wrtie when asked in physics exam about friction
according in the non affected by tt
and ill translate:
the force strictly necesary to make that a body slides over other is INDEPENDENT of the area of contact and its proportional to the normal reaction
edit:
oh and the true fundamental law of physics its in that link on starlight bending:
nature does as it pleases
edit:
http://www.tribology-abc.com/abc/history.htm
do you realize how history MAY have been rewritten?
even outlaw says friction is DPENDANT on surface
of course its counterintuitive, as counterituivtive as all false things
oh but no way can we both outlaw and me be samrter than those HISTORIC genious who are conspiring and reading this at this very same moment 500 years ago
edit:
hey "they" could tt and eliminate races
if there are no races people will believe friction is NOT dependant of surfaces
those huge tyres may make those who are not conspiring believe galileleo montamas and cuolombs were just crooks
edit:
otlaw your a smart guy try this one:
what happens if you have a double ramp like this ^ in which two identical weights are united through a pulley by an string
the coeficient of friction of the left is 0.1 while in the right 0.9, both weights produce a tangential force to the ramp bigger than friction for being very heavy