This link, provided by you, definitively explains that refraction is accounted for...
The following link, provided by you...
Simply notes that, as far as the author was aware, refraction had not been taken into account.
Quote:
Originally Posted by raaaid
thatsnks outlaw id never thought i would be apreciating being called asinine, hey but if its given with reason....
|
I did not call you asinine.
Quote:
Originally Posted by raaaid
oh and on censorship: i see no censorship at all in this forum yet some antiliberty people want me censored for being a free thinker
|
Incorrect. They want you censored because they think you are an annoying idiot.
Quote:
Originally Posted by raaaid
of course what makes it being a 4th hit its my free thinking
|
No, what makes it 4th is the fact that invisible tribbles are taking over the Google server farms.
My statement is 100% as valid as yours.
Of course, the fact that it is not always 4th makes both statements totally incorrect.
Quote:
Originally Posted by raaaid
very few people question what theyre told, i do
|
How many physics students have you interviewed to determine whether or not they question what they are told? We both know the answer.
Knowing that the answer is zero, your claim that very few people question what they are told is 100% invalid.
Quote:
Originally Posted by raaaid
seems my free thinking unveild the relativity scam, and few were able to
and i did so with FREE THINKING not regurgitating propagandistic conspiracy theory made to seed terror and hopelessness or fox ultraright wings ideas as we can keep destroying our planet cause we are making huge printed paper
|
Except that your "free thinking" was backed up by numerous links that were posted BEFORE YOU MADE YOUR CLAIM. Thus, all you did was regurgitate what other people HAVE ALREADY SAID. You said NOTHING that had not been said already.
Quote:
Originally Posted by raaaid
searching relativity falsified gets me on the 1st page of google
am i a free thinking pioneer?
|
Your lack of cognitive ability is truly astounding. Google the following...
I-16 vs. 109E - 3 min. 12 sec.
One of my websites will be first. What does it mean?
Quote:
Originally Posted by raaaid
maybe what im doing which is so annoying fo the stablishment why they drove me crazy with tv is the revolutionary seeds im planting like for examp0le the huge lies of education as relativity or coulombs law on friction being independent of surface?
|
Coulomb never claimed the friction force was independent of the surface (and this has already been noted to you).
You already said you don't believe that relativity is wrong so how can it be a lie. Regardless, a link PROVIDED BY YOU has already shown that your statements about relativity are incorrect.
Thus, it is obvious to even a dead rat that you are not annoying the "stablishment", and they are not trying to drive you crazy. The OVERDOSE of DRUGS has already done that.
Quote:
Originally Posted by raaaid
googling relativity falsified gives you 4.630.000 hits
this thread appears on 10th position
doesnt this proof the annoying noise im making and the real reason why this guys want me out
|
No, it does not give you 4,630,000 "hits". It gives you, "about 4,630,000 RESULTS". It has nothing to do with hit count. Furthermore, I just goggled it with and without quotes and this thread was in the 11th position without quotes and did not appear in the first 3 pages with quotes.
Which PROVES that you are incapable of understanding how search engine indexing works.
--Outlaw.