Quote:
|
Sorry, I was just trying to save time
|
No you were not Osprey. You just don't like the fact I don't agree with you on some things.
Grow up.
First of all,
it does not make a bit of difference to "test" something and then completely invalidate the effort because of ignorance.
I am not calling anyone ignorant so don't turn it into that. There is a reason why aeronautical engineering efforts are teams in the real world. There is a lot of details that can bite you.
Now, there are some knowledgeable and experienced people on these boards.
You want the dev's to listen and make your favorite gameshape as easy for you to live out your ace fantasy as possible, right?
1C knows what they are doing in terms of aircraft performance. The fact they have adjusted the FM's once says they are concerned. Now, you are saying after all the time they just spent adjusting things....it is completely wrong.
Based on what??
Whines waste time and more importantly money to a company. The people at 1C are paid and the company estabilished the boards to save some of that money by cutting down on the number of wild goose chases they send their people on.
If you want to be listenend too then raise legitimate issues. The first thing is is to determine if there is an issue in the first place.
Aircraft performance is dependant upon conditions. Without the conditions, what IvanK posted is interesting like an art gallery is interesting but not very useful for making any conclusions about specific aircraft performance.
1. Determine the atmospheric conditions in the game- that is the first priority. If it is not correct, anything else is a pointless waste of time.