Quote:
Originally Posted by Crumpp
In relation to each other, I think the performance is correct.
Is the specific performance of any airplane in the game correct? Spitfire, Hurricane, Bf-109?? Not really.
Is the relationship's based on performance correct for all the fighters? Yes
Aircraft performance comparision is all relative.
The relative performance appears correct. All aircraft have a similar margin of error applied.
What more do you want? That is the most important thing in a "simulation".
It is much more important than specific performance. You can get the specific performance absolutely right within the percentage range and completely screw up the relative performance.
|
So what your saying is... The game feels right from what is in writen in pilots accounts?
Sorry thats what i call folklore. Its not science. Even when written by an ace. Fear adrenaline and other factors which cloud the mind come into play. Ever seen a report of a crime by witnesses where every witness said a different storey? I have. Its not a fact, its a memory.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kwiatek
Lol how it could be correct if both these planes are just way too slow even for 87 octan fuel versions?
|
Kwaitek, you did flight models for UP. It alarms me you cant control yourself when I ask someone else their opinion in a forum specifically and your emotions require you to laugh at me and "state your "expert" opinion". How can you apply scientific thought when you are so easily ruled by you emotions? - I dont require an answer by the way...
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kwiatek
You people read what was written in these forum?
|
Yes and do you see what I did in this thread? I analysed, I provoked, I suggested with and without belief, I theorised... -Then I made a judgement... Dont be so ignorant. Assumptions are not always right at first glance.