View Single Post
  #2  
Old 05-14-2012, 12:07 AM
Crumpp's Avatar
Crumpp Crumpp is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,552
Default

Quote:
"Dangerous" I don't believe appears in the NACA Spitfire document that is imo an embellishment
No that is in the Operating Notes....

Quote:
The term unacceptable also needs to be qualified ... it was unacceptable to the criteria NACA was using.
Yes, the only defined standards in the world at the time besides the German's. Post-war, the RAE adopted the exact same standards as the NACA.

So, we can say in 1940, the RAE had no standards, they just knew they had a dangerous airplane so they warn the pilot often.

In 1946, the early mark Spitfires would have been labeled as "unacceptable" by the RAE but since they had to have bob-weights, there was no need.

You won't find a Spitfire flying today without bob-weights.