must indicate if much of the code has been re written or overhauled to such an extent then it is actually 2 steps back and for good reason. if i were involved i think getting the system back to where it was previously is quite important and i think they have achieved that as far as i can tell given consumer reports.

it is where it goes from here on that matters, if the code is proved solid enough then incrementally we can or should maybe see it get better. thats my hope tbh. i presume it was so bad it did need re writing ? that is the story for the overhaul isnt it?

we need to indulge in some logical thinking here about the state the sim is in with a healthy does of understanding about starting from scratch ir near enough.

simply put, it may not be good but maybe they are where they should be given the re write. painfull yes, understandable yes, worth predicting outcome, not quite yet.

this is my nuisance self simply trying to apply some logic to it all. sorry if i offend anyone elses wizdom on the matter.