View Single Post
  #6  
Old 05-06-2012, 04:51 AM
tk471138 tk471138 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 285
Default

Beta testing report....

First of all thanks to the devs for allowing us to get our hands on this BETA PATCH (which means it WILL have bugs, and its our job to find and report them, not to bitch and moan about how their are bugs in an optional BETA patch

I do agree with some who say that things are not much different between this patch and the previous "stable" version (or in this case the 1.05 final version)

i do get the red box when i open the program but that seems to be a minor issue or superficial at best...

the first time i really gave the program a go, i had a ctd after about 15-20 min on a custom mission over England.
after that open program again and played the same mission, i was able to play and edit and replay the mission for more than an hour (maybe even two) before i had another ctd, which is an improvement from what i was experiencing prior to the beta.


other than that i guess this is a step in the right direction...

hopefully some of the known issues are corrected ASAP,

especially the small caliber bullet holes, since most of the guns so far are of the small caliber kind (7.92 .303 ect) i like to shoot a target some and then pause it and admire the damage i had just done, or even admire the damage that was done to me...


also with the log = 1 or what ever in the conf.ini (which i did) when the thing does ctd, is there a way to know if something was actually sent, is something supposed to pop up, and tell me to send it...cuz the times its stop responding and crashed, nothing came up indicating that a log file was sent or generated....

AA ssao vsync grass is all off as is the epilepsy filter (dont get me started) ..things like buildings amount & detail are set to low forest very low land shading medium, the rest are on HIGH or original screen res is 1920x1080

edit some have stated that you have been removing features and lowering graphics settings on the users in order to make such improvements....in fact this was already implemented in previous patches, instead of simply eliminating them from the program and lowering settings, how about adding in settings for the users themselves to change, instead of an across the board change where the user has no choice, even the user who can utilize the features with out any lag

Last edited by tk471138; 05-06-2012 at 05:02 AM.
Reply With Quote