Quote:
Originally Posted by Outlaw
In the past you have mentioned your degree when noting your mastery of the English language. Your new statement above explains a LOT.
"yet you called me a lier about my degree and when i post proof you didnt withdraw"
I'm pretty sure you said infinite but, maybe not, so I'll acquiesce.
Regardless, it does not matter what number you actually stated. It is wrong because you denied that the astronaut would feel the actual g-forces.
"it would feel zero g however the acelerations is, thats the thing about indiferent buoyancy"
Actually, you said this...
"if i say win its tacitly understand usually, you as contrarian rather undersatand tacitly always"
Nowhere did you say, "USUALLY". In fact, aside from the above, you have not used the word usually at all in this thread. Furthermore, aside from the above, I am the only one that has used the word usually in this entire thread.
"neither dis i say always as you said i said"
I will reiterate, "THE TITLE OF THE THREAD STATES THAT YOU DO KNOW".
Do you wish to recant your statement?
"i already did correct my first impresion by the left handed dna explanation so i might be worng in my 1st statemnet though a fokker dr1 turns much faster one sense than the other due to preccesion"
--Outlaw.
|
so youre work having fun arguing right
well i respect you since you dont insult me as others but next time you say a thing as my degrees being imaginary plz have the manhood to retract your offensive for me statement when gieven proofs
if it helps i see you as a friend after all these years