Quote:
Originally Posted by irR4tiOn4L
And REALISTIC!
What's your deal anyway? Why does this bother you? (not like I don't already know)
Plus, I thought you know what I was saying ALL ALONG? OR did you JUST figure this out?
|
Nah, I figured it in the first couple of posts...
Quote:
Originally Posted by irR4tiOn4L
Finally - tell me, how big is your monitor, what is it's resolution and how far away do you sit from it? Do you use track ir,
|
23" (its in my sig
)1920 x 1080, about a meter, maybe a bit over and on occasion (again... its in my sig.
) - but not all the time
Quote:
Originally Posted by irR4tiOn4L
do you change FOV's to 'zoom in' (which Btw YOU YOURSELF advocated earlier!)?
|
I think you may find I said something slightly different...
unless of course, you gotten yourself a tad confused and where thinking back to this one?
Quote:
Originally Posted by irR4tiOn4L
Why not, at least for head tracking users, just build in the option to change FOV on the fly to the realistic level (39?) so that we can at least conduct more or less realistic "scans" by zooming in the view and carefully scanning a section of the sky at realistic size? Sure, its not as quick or wide as 70 fov or our eyes in reality, and its not all that elegant, but it'd do the job better than most any other solution I'd think. Even if it would feel like using binoculars at times.
As many have pointed out anyway, it takes time to scan the sky.
|