Thread: Release it?
View Single Post
  #7  
Old 04-14-2012, 03:48 AM
tk471138 tk471138 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 285
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nephris View Post
Of ffs..not another useless thread on that...

Old development rule:
Release it, when it´s done!

Again:
How many of you will cry & whine for a patch that introduces new bugs?
Patience is virtue


I bed my 2 pennies this thread will be deleted...any calls?


your argument is null and void seeing as how they didnt follow this rule to begin with...at least if they release the BETA patch, it would have the word BETA attached to it....

if they release a beta patch, its the users choice to download it or not...why delay testing on the community which you know they will end up doing anyways...

it would also be a good way to test the new bug tracker....

but of course giving the user a choice, and optional download, is no good for anyone....even those who dont want it could simply choose to not download it they would rather impose their own views on others, and have it so NO ONE can download it....what a joke...


edit i keep seeing "dont release it till its done" so following this train of though, releasing anything beta is a no no?? i mean its not like they followed this rule to begin with...i mean the DAMAGE IS DONE...releasing a BETA patch to the community, isnt the worst thing they could do...i guess you people who say "dont release it till its done" refused to download the previous beta patches...i. suppose you people refuse to download beta patches that hotfix an issue, cuz the nature of beta implies that its not finished...unless you refuse to download all kinds of "beta" releases you are nothing but a hypocrite, and probably a fanboy...

Last edited by tk471138; 04-14-2012 at 03:52 AM.
Reply With Quote