Chivas said:

>>Falstaff, Its called common sence...you should try it.<<

Playground 101 aside...I'm not the one who take sit upon himself to be self-appointed oracle of each step inside the dev house, or making spurious generalisations about people's motives in questioning who is reponsible for this goddamn-awful fiasco...all the while adopting a tone of detached factualness. When pushed on this months (and years) previously you said you have zero inside track on the dev process, and unlike some of us, have never worked in a dev software house.

It may impress and seems coolly logical to some younger members. It doesn't fool me for a second, and, I'd guess, others. It's mostly a veil for attacking the critics. Sorry, whiners.

*Common-sense* dictates you dont make yourself sound like a mouthpiece or intellectual proclaimer of the ongoing dev process...if you have not a whit of a sniff of a jot of clue about what is actually going on inside there.

In reality it's just 'Dont panic, the first ship may be sinking, but just look at the nice shadows coming through the wheel in the cabin of the next ship...'

I find your assumptions, and the tone that delivers them, laughable.

I'm surprised others haven't called you on it more often.

Ben