My opposition is not about the cheat-discussion but because of personal experiences and a somewhat "sarcastic" outlook on people in general. Meaning I do not trust "the people" not to mess up everything in the worst possible way. I like centralization and combined efforts under a sensible and responsible management and do not like the "watering can" of "everything goes". Having said that I think the cheater issue is less about cheating itself but about the impression of someone cheating, the suspicions and the resulting bad blood. That could (and will) crack "the community".
Since Lexx posted while I was typing:
Actually I have some serious issues with the way DCG portrays a "dynamic campaign". Namely the influence players have on the frontline. I find that part way overdone, a simplification of factors which are outside the scope of a simple flight simulation. Most of these have to do with strategical decisions of a high command, of wartime economics and supply on a much broader scale.
Last edited by csThor; 04-03-2008 at 05:02 PM.
|