Not long ago AAA did NOT "allow" FM, DM (weapons) changes but now it seems thats out the window with for ex. a completly new Spit Mk1 with a completly new flight model done by people in the manner they "think" it should be, the same people who a few months ago did not allow FM, DM changes btw. If it was only 1 singel ac done to fit the whole game/gameplay it might be passeble, but everyone knows it wont stop there.
Rules ar fine..as long as people follow them...wich they don`t .....if one dont force them (with locked code for axample)[/QUOTE]
And is God...Sorry I mean Oleg any different? How many notable people in the community bitch and scream about how their favourite ride is wrong because Oleg and Co were biased in the coding of the 'plane becasue thats how they think it should be? the F6F as an example.
Whats the difference Baron? AAA are extremely vigilant with FM DM changes. Just as vicous as certain people are in their denouncement of those using mods (Which for some reason they persist in calling a "hack") sometimes I havent been able to tell the difference. If someone posts there asking "can I have it this way becasue its super cool and I dont like it how it is" they are quickly banished or told to move along and the threads are often locked. Same as you people are at the zoo and here.
As for the Spit Mk.1 I have and I must say that it isn't some idiots wet dream. they have done a top notch job on it. The carby cutout works just right and so does the lack of firepower and I could go on and on.
Ultimately I think it comes down to a matter of pride. You have the newer younger generation who are getting into simming, and you have the adult jaded group who want to leave things as they are.
I know this post is incoherent. It's later and I'm very tired. I'll probably shake my head in embaressment when i read it tomorow but I'm just so sick of the stupidity and hypocrisy that some people have
|