Quote:
Originally Posted by mmaruda
I'm still not convinced to the 190s.
|
Can you please provide any numbers / charts, or did you commit any in-game testing tu support this statement?
Quote:
Originally Posted by mmaruda
1. they counted the planes destroyed on the ground
|
No they did not, Abschuss was Abschuss.
Quote:
Originally Posted by mmaruda
2. kill confirmation was not as rigorous as in the RAF - the British had to have a witness to officially get a kill, and if 2 guys shot the same plane, each would get half a kill, with the Germans, both pilots would get a kill - it was a policy that generated great propaganda.
|
Also untrue, the Germans were actually very strict about confirming aerial victories. Please have a look at the amount of unconfirmed victories (e.g. reported but not accounted for) or just read some kill reports.
Quote:
Originally Posted by mmaruda
3. the most important reason, the Soviets had mostly crap pilots in crap planes made out of plywood and mama Galina's knickers. The test numbers were good, but production quality was terrible. Many planes would simply fall apart in high G manoeuvres. That's why the Germans had absolutely no problems outfighting the Soviets.
|
This is true somehow in the very early stage of war, but the Russian side certainly improved on tactics and pilot quality. Anyway, this has got nothing to do with the Fw 190. Btw try to find Russian isights on German fighters on Eastern Front and see if they have had greater deal of respect of 190 or 190
As for the Kommandogeraet, it's not really to be described as 'automatic gearbox'
, but I believe it is certainly modelled better than it was in 4.10.1