View Single Post
  #118  
Old 01-15-2012, 01:06 PM
SA_Chaney_475th SA_Chaney_475th is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 9
Smile

Quote:
Originally Posted by robtek View Post
Because it seems to be worse than pearl harbor with "hurra - patriotism" and unbelievable cgi flight scenes.

after the original (tuskegee airman), this can only leave a bad taste, imo.

I'd even prefer captain future and the world of tomorrow, there i know it is basically a comic.
Something isn't quite right here lol. Let's pretend this movie was about Gunther Rall. Would that change the mood a lil bit? Now we all can understand Pearl Harbor. It was a love story and c'mon, a chick flick at best. So what I'm saying is, there are pieces missing here for all this negative response to the movie none of you have even seen. For one, you grumbling sons of a's aint going to get a live show. Gotta go to an Air Show for that and most likely you won't get the manuevering because hell, what 2 million dollar warbird owner is going to do snap rolls all day in his vintage p-51 for YOUR amusement?
Ok we had Memphis Belle a few years back. All star cast! No one seemed to complain then. CGI was still in it's "getting better" stage. The First TA movie was made with maybe 5000 dollars. It was as horrible as Mosquito Squadron. Guys, when will you realize that you are asking for too much? Now if you have personal reasons why you can't or don't wanna see a movie about how horridly America treated our African American pilots , who helped win the war by the way!, then that's between you and God. But to sit there and criticize a movie for the CGI effects from the same director that broght you Star Wars??? I don't want to curse so I'll stop here. Bottom-line is, bring a better excuse because some of you aren't being honest to these readers.
Reply With Quote