Quote:
Originally Posted by KeBrAnTo
This was all my point since the beginning, pal. Contacts are very difficult to be spotted, full stop.
|
wrong again ! try and use specific words to give meaning to what you are trying to say, instead of this meaningless superficial self gratifying banter your producing which doesnt contribute anything
let me try and rephrase it for you correctly the statement you just made "
some contacts are very difficult to spot
under some specific circumstances and visibility conditions ". and that is the starting point of the discussion, not the end
hint: as a starting point the comparison has to be made in near perfect visibility conditions. once that is done other observations can be made as to how correctly certain weather and atmospheric conditions are represented and how correctly/badly it affects visibility in CoD compared to real life (but that is much more complex, first we need comparisons under near perfect visibility conditions)
Quote:
Originally Posted by KeBrAnTo
Then all this technical stuff started to fly in all directions, that human eye is designed to focus on movement, etc .....
|
try and at least read the previous posts before you "contribute". the difference between static and moving target identification is very significant, and has been listed as a variable that needs to be differentiated when comparing different observations or historical account. we already knew that much, thanks !