Its not difficult to understand what 'replay factor' means is it?

Ill tell you why im strangely obsessed mate,, it's because im paying money for a game that i cant go back to play again once i have been thru it.

After Ive completed the campaign there is nothing left to do ok!!

Same as most of those previous titles,, just because they didn't include Skirmish in them dosent make that a good thing,, you can call it tradition, i call it incomplete!

I got my retail copy of Soldiers: HOWWII right there on the shelf mate! bought it when it came out and i can tell you straight that as soon as 'Soldiers' was released there was outrage about why there was no multiplayer, skirmish or whatever!! this is fact! so i don't think its entirely true to say tho that nobody complained about them.

It is perfectly possible to have a good single player game like MOW-V that also includes versatile options for extended play, such as skirmish.

Is anybody here saying that Skirmish would 'not' have been beneficial to MOW-V or any of those previous titles?

Final question,

Whilst in development of MOW-V, if you had a coder there offering to make you a complete skirmish mode add-on without compromising the current game, would you say 'no were not going to include that because its not traditional'?