[bongodriver]

I dunno how to explain this point anymore

Yeah you got nothing left.....fail

the British dominion over the US mainland was annihilated, the US started a new independent reality, that sounds like a win to me. At the blurry end of the Battle of Britain, apart for reputations and morale, nothing else changed.

But the British military was not anhilated, and we could have chosen to fight back, we just gave up, not worth the effort with all othe commitments (just like the Germans), yeah funny how this argument suits you here.

you (badly) repelled a bombing attack that was carried on for several months, their command was tired to wait any longer on Goering's fail, they moved onto something else, end of story.

You gained some heroes to celebrate, both countries learned LOADS in terms of experience, soon the Germans forgot about it thanks to the early successes of Barbarossa. It was just a phase of a more complicated war, not a battle per se.

Ah so we fought badly now, what happened to the description of exemplary regarding our effort in an earlier post (yeah take a look, you really did say it), sniff...sniff....I smell hypocricy and contradiction again.

because in a total war the success is obtained only by complete annihilation of the adversary's offensive potential, subduing it to an unconditioned surrender.

That is a condition required to win a war....not a battle....loike the 'battle of britain' which was a 'win' for the Brits......grab that thesaurus....win and victory are practically the same thing non?

I tried to, and it was my original point, but then all kind of $hit started flying in every direction..
Uh and let's not forget this: the western civilised world is grateful to the Allies for the efforts they made to liberate us from the Nazi scum.

That s**t flew as soon as people started rubbishing any part the British played in the allied effort, like we just arent worthy of being associated with it....no for most of the Germanophiles her Allies = the US strictly