Thread: Arguments, speculations, rants and generally off-topic/repetitive topics megathread
View Single Post
  #8  
Old 08-06-2011, 01:06 PM
6S.Manu 6S.Manu is offline
Approved Member
  
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Venice - Italy
Posts: 585
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zorin View Post
If they already fail at the obvious, do we really want to know(we do know actually) what has been messed up behind the visuals?
I totally agree with this quote. They say "detailed FMs and DMs"... the engine who manages them can be good, but if the guys put wrong data in it can we really call this a sim? And this goes on since the old IL2.

I don't trust them anymore. For that I would like to have excellent engines (graphical, FM, DM ect...) but above all a SDK to correct the data so I can sim with my preferred community.
__________________

A whole generation of pilots learned to treasure the Spitfire for its delightful response to aerobatic manoeuvres and its handiness as a dogfighter. Iit is odd that they had continued to esteem these qualities over those of other fighters in spite of the fact that they were of only secondary importance tactically.Thus it is doubly ironic that the Spitfire’s reputation would habitually be established by reference to archaic, non-tactical criteria.
Reply With Quote