Quote:
Originally Posted by Querer
You're right, but we can still expect from the company selling software to do the best job possible. If this is not possible due to whatever reason, the customer decide whether to buy it or not, so basically it is each ones own fault in buying the software although it is crap, especially with forums filled with threads about the bugs of the software. However, in today's world, no one of the developer has then to complain about not making enough money due to low sell rates, that's life as well. If they do not want to keep up with the standarts we are used to, bad luck, sooner or later they are not able to sell anything anymore. Sadly, I see more and more companies drifting towards mean quality standarts and more and more people who accept this and even justify this by comments as above. I am sorry for the poor working conditions in this branch of software development, but honestly, I also have to take extra care that I do not do anything wrong in my job, even if this goes with unpaid extra hours. So what? Quality is what makes the products more valuable over others, if you don't want to stick to this, it's your choice but you have to life with the outcome.
Comments like the one from Luthier are funny in a way, as we all know that they try hard to get this new sound engine implemented and are fed up with all the questions about the progress, but if we are absolutely strict, comments like this are just a offense to us customers as a proper sound engine should have been part of the initial release product. As already some people mentioned, for other products we are as well not willing to accept an unfinished one being sold as finished. And I am sure, that Luthier would as well complain if his OS would be as buggy as his game. The difference? The big company behind the OS? Simply not a valuable argument, as there are example of small software companies offering products almost free of bugs...
Well, enough text now, I belong to the group of customers buying CloD with knowing about all the bugs and I still got several hours fun out of it and thanks to the fact that there are other things in life, I am waiting for the updates  |
I think you are saddling the horse from the rear here. It is not like we buy this Sim out of pure altruism. Ppl here "want" that Sim and given there is no alternative out there, argueing on a "oh, so they failed, bad luck, let's move on" is not exactly the most smart way to apporach this issue. Sure, if you go by this "customer is always right" principle, then you certainly have a point. But in it's final consequence, that would mean, no Sim at all. Purely personal opinion here, but I rather have a flawed product with ppl working on it to solve the issue then no product at all. And it is not as if those folks, as many times metioned before, do not have a history of delivering.
Imho, a lot of trust and perspective here is simply destoyed by people that obviously consider market principles of a higher value then having a flight Sim.