Quote:
Originally Posted by raaaid
yes i can put a thread in a needle cause i have pseudostereoscopic view
but plz dont you agree that the depth perception of a 3d game or movie is different to that of real life?
thats my whole point for it not being implemented since would be kind of cheating augmented reality
the thing is FIVE TIMES IN MY LIFE I HAD A 20 SECONDS PERCEPTION IDENTICAL TO THAT OF A 3D MOVIE
therefore my confusion
i know my perception of 3d is wrong cause ive had brief times of awesome depth perception(like in a movie)i wonder about the rest
for example could marseill excelsior at deflection shooting be due to having had authentic steroscopic sight contrary to the rest?
|
The big difference between 3D film/tv/gaming and real life is depth of field and focus.. If something in the background of a 3D film is out of focus you can never get it in focus like you could in RL this confuses the brain and can make watchng 3d films hard work.
At the end of the day 3d is a 'trick' there is no depth, it just looks like it. Your brain knows this and that's why 3d feels like 3d, not RL.
As for your depth perception...
Here's a test
http://www.mediacollege.com/3d/depth...tion/test.html
3D would have some advantages over 2D in CloD, the main one being the ability to see past the cockpit framework more easily. I don't think it would improve shooting though.