View Single Post
  #59  
Old 06-09-2011, 01:18 PM
Kurfürst Kurfürst is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 705
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Al Schlageter View Post
If the LW was not running out of a/c then why was it that those units participating in the BoB could not be kept at establishment strength? In fact, they had a decreasing number of a/c available.

April 1940,
5,178 aircraft: 671 reconnaissance, 1,620 fighters, 1,726 bombers, 419 dive bombers, 46 ground attack, 230 coastal, and 466 transport.

October 1940 - 1,420
November 1940 - 1,423
December 1940 - 1,393

That should be decreasing somewhat towards the end and some 300 less than in April 1940.

numbers from Strategy for Defeat.
"Missed" something in Strategy for Defeat between April and October, perhaps? Battle of France, maybe?

Strenght 4.5.1940: 1758 bombers
Strenght 29.6.1940: 1380 bombers

So the whole story, bomber strenght in 1940:

April 1940 - 1,726 bombers
Strenght 4.5.1940: 1758 bombers
29.6.1940: 1380 bombers
29.9.1940 - 1,420
2.11.1940 - 1,423
30.11.1940 - 1,393

Source: Strategy for Defeat, Table IX, Table X, Table XI.

In short the Battle of France, though short but very intesive was what that decreased German bomber numbers, the Battle of Britain did not decreased them at all in comparison, whatever Bungay wants to tell.
__________________
Il-2Bugtracker: Feature #200: Missing 100 octane subtypes of Bf 109E and Bf 110C http://www.il2bugtracker.com/issues/200
Il-2Bugtracker: Bug #415: Spitfire Mk I, Ia, and Mk II: Stability and Control http://www.il2bugtracker.com/issues/415

Kurfürst - Your resource site on Bf 109 performance! http://kurfurst.org
Reply With Quote