Quote:
Originally Posted by winny
Like I said earlier, I'm not biased, I just like a good discussion and I like to come at things from a slightly different angle..
|
I love to hear this, and you can be sure I am interested in the same. That's why I do not bother to answer to poster who are not.. and that's why I keep responding to you. There's always something to learn IMHO!
Now, it may be me, but the thing is that I always like to get statements based on solid evidence.
Same thing with the Luftwaffe in the BoB - you won't find me saying that all of the LW was flying on 100 octane fuel, even though I could present such evidence that would make it seem as much that everything from 109s to 110s and even 88 flew on the thing... I know perfectly well that there was but a wing of 109, a couple of more wings of 110s, and the 100 octane fuel found in a Ju 88 tank was probably a matter of simplier logistics or a shared airfield with a 100 octane unit...
Quote:
|
What is AVIA 10/282? I'd love to spend a day in the archives..
|
Its the archival refernce to the file held at the British National Archives in Kew, which contains the meetings relevant to the decisions behind the use of 100 octane in the Battle of Brtiain. Some (in fact: all) papers I've seen from I've already posted in the thread.
AVIA 10/282 Co-ordination of Oil Policy Committee: meetings 1-25
http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/c...ID=4223197&j=1
AVIA 10/283 Co-ordination of Oil Policy Committee: fuel-oil requirements
should be also interesting.
I believe you can take copies with a digital camera for free, though you might need to pre-register. I'd believe the contents of this file pretty much settle the issue for good. All the decisions should be recorded in it, so either it says they converted all fighters and supplied fuel to them or not...