Quote:
Originally Posted by KOM.Nausicaa
I have experienced it myself in a cockpit replica 1:1 with working REVI once. (109 artisanal replica).
|
You cannot compare sitting in a replica for an actual aircraft under field conditions. Under field conditions, in war, the Revi will be adjusted to suit whoever is flying the particular aircraft.
I am 173cm tall. Imagine I jump into a 109, fine-tune the gunsight so I get a clear image in my right eye as I look forward (just as the makers intended), and then jump out again.
Now imagine someone else hops in straight after, perhaps 190cm tall. He will be forced to stoop, bend over or lean in order to see the reticle. Because it was not adjusted for him.
So, he adjusts the sight to his preference and jumps out.
Now I jump back in and
now I can't see the reticle without moving/leaning/Shift-F1ing myself into position.
If I get into a BMW-3 straight after a 150cm tall man has just got out, I will probably bash my knees on the wheel or fascia if I do not adjust the seat. But it would be wrong to claim that bruising one's knees is a known feature of the BMW-3 series. In a similar vein, if I go to the museum and jump in to the nearest 109 on display I would undoubtedly have to manoeuver my head in order to get a clear image of the reticle....because the Revi isn't adjusted for me. It's adjusted for someone else (probably no-one in particular).
OK, just a couple more things before the caffeine wears off.....
You mentioned the cramped nature of the cockpit. It's safe to say the 109's cockpit dimensions are legendarily claustrophobic. Therefore can you think of a worse idea than to install a gunsight into this aircraft that requires the pilot to start shifting about? I can't.
What possible advantage is it to install a gunsight in a high performance aircraft that requires the pilot to start leaning over
just to be able to see the gun-sight? I can think of no advantages at all. None.